tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2514232298104247719.post2842835183372387289..comments2023-10-26T06:17:29.762-07:00Comments on Hubbard Foundation, CCSVI, and Health: ECTRIMS Abstracts on CCSVI 2012Hubbard Foundationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11393742351493254157noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2514232298104247719.post-77166725339426560272012-10-12T07:51:33.482-07:002012-10-12T07:51:33.482-07:00interesting discussion in this blog.
http://multi...interesting discussion in this blog.<br /><br />http://multiple-sclerosis-research.blogspot.fr/2012/10/fraudulent-ccsvi-study-self-interests.html<br /><br />It seems that Dr Sinan does not know what he is talking about !!!! Dr Alroughani showed results of patients who underwent the venoplasty outside Kuwait and those patients were not followed by Sinan's group. <br /><br />Why are they so doing this to this poor neurologist !!! Think and think. It is money. The interventionist and surgeons are doing it for a fee (up to 8000 USD). If they are so empathic and concerned about the patients, who do not they do the procedure for free or at least by govenmental funds through trials or after the approval of venoplasty through the authorities Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2514232298104247719.post-62150444786230323942012-10-11T18:42:20.187-07:002012-10-11T18:42:20.187-07:00We have attended the poster today. Dr Alroughani s...We have attended the poster today. Dr Alroughani said that the studied parients underwent the procedure outside Kiwait and in fact Dr Sinan's group were not involved since there were conducting the trial in kowait. <br /><br />Dr Alroughani indicated that he and the co-author did a chart review of his patients who did the procedure outside their country. He did not look at the safety of the procedure nor he has data on angio results. He basically presented neuro and MRI data. <br /><br />Dr Alroughani deserves an apology from this blog and Dr Sinan because of their false accusation. I think he is being so kind in not pushing for legal actions against those who tried to ruine his reputation. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2514232298104247719.post-57763426731464000092012-10-08T04:57:46.124-07:002012-10-08T04:57:46.124-07:00An interesting and exhaustive piece of research on...An interesting and exhaustive piece of research on this matter can be found here.<br />http://multiple-sclerosis-research.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/fraudulent-ccsvi-study-self-interests.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2514232298104247719.post-20733730632670288362012-10-06T01:15:55.744-07:002012-10-06T01:15:55.744-07:00Dr Alroughani's abstract did not include any p...Dr Alroughani's abstract did not include any patients that were assessed by Dr Tariq's group. Dr Alroughani included patients who did the procedure outside any other study protocol as indicated in the poster. Patients performed the procedures outside Kuwait but they were patients of Dr Alroughani and he has been following them for year. Dr Alroughani's team performed a chart review and a retrospective snalysis. I do not see why Dr Sinan is so upset! These patients were not assessed by Dr Sinan's team. <br /><br />Two other points should be raised in response to the email posted by Dr Sinan:<br />1. I do not it is ethical to accuse colleagues publically and only present one side of the coin. Sit together and discuss any concerns. At least show some respect to the profession <br />2. Any research has to get approval from the ethics committee but the results do not need this since it is scientific. Dr Sinan's has a major misunderstanding of this concept. If you read his email, i would have serious concern about his accuracy, behaviour and medical ethics. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com